Immunoglobulin National Society
Calabasas, California
Immunoglobulin National Society
Calabasas, California
Post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC, commonly referred to as long COVID) has emerged as a chronic multisystem consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic, representing a growing clinical and societal burden. It affects an estimated 1 in 3 survivors worldwide, with symptoms in 36% of patients at 12 months.1,2
Mechanistic studies characterize long COVID as a neuroimmune dysregulation syndrome characterized by chronic inflammation, viral antigen persistence, complement activation, endothelial injury, and autonomic dysfunction. The biological heterogeneity of long COVID underscores the need for immune-restorative therapies that modulate and promote vascular recovery, without suppressing immune function. Symptoms persisting beyond 12 weeks include fatigue, cognitive dysfunction, dyspnea, and autonomic disturbance, reflecting complex immune and vascular dysregulation.2-7
This review summarizes the recent advances in immunopathogenesis and therapeutic modulation of long COVID, highlighting the scientific rationale for targeted immunotherapy and practical considerations for integrating these approaches into multidisciplinary care.
Clinical Presentation
Risk Factors for Long COVID
The risk for long COVID is influenced by host, viral, and clinical factors, underscoring its multifaceted nature (Table 1).1-3,5,7-10
| Table 1. Established Risk Factors for Long COVID | |
| Risk factor | Evidence and clinical insights |
|---|---|
| Female sex | Women have a nearly 2-fold higher risk for persistent symptoms, influenced by hormonal and immune differences. |
| Severity of acute infection | Hospitalization, high viral load, and oxygen requirement correlate with later cognitive and pulmonary sequelae. |
| Preexisting immune or metabolic dysfunction | Autoimmune disease, diabetes, obesity, and dyslipidemia impair immune resolution and endothelial repair. |
| Age, 35-60 y | Middle-aged adults represent the highest burden of prolonged symptoms. |
| Low baseline antibody titers/delayed seroconversion | Associated with impaired viral clearance and complement overactivation. |
| Genetic predisposition | Variants in FOXP4 and other immune-regulatory genes increase susceptibility to persistent inflammation. |
| Based on references 1-3, 5, and 7-10. | |
Impact on Women
Women represent nearly two-thirds of long-COVID cases, a disparity consistently observed across global and US cohorts. Several biological and social factors contribute to this pattern1-3,7,10-12:
- Hormonal influence. Declining estrogen and progesterone levels influence cytokine regulation and endothelial repair, contributing to fatigue and dysautonomia.
- Genetic susceptibility. FOXP4 and X-linked immune genes enhance antiviral sensitivity but predispose to immune persistence.
- Autoimmunity and immune priming. Women exhibit higher baseline antibody reactivity and risk for autoreactive B-cell expansion.
- Socioeconomic impact. Women report greater productivity loss and caregiving disruption; more than one-fourth of all affected individuals have reduced work hours or have left the workforce temporarily.
These findings underscore the need for sex-aware trial design and for monitoring long-COVID phenotypes through reproductive transitions, pregnancy, and menopause.
Clusters of Symptoms in Long COVID
Long COVID presents with heterogeneous but reproducible symptom clusters that often align with specific immune-pathophysiologic endotypes. Five major clusters account for most patient presentations (Table 2).1-4,7,8,10,13-15
| Table 2. Clusters of Symptoms in Long COVID | |
| Symptom cluster/endotype | Dominant features |
|---|---|
| Neurologic/cognitive | Brain fog, memory loss, headache, insomnia, paresthesia, dysautonomia |
| Cardiopulmonary/vascular | Dyspnea, palpitations, chest pain, exercise intolerance, orthostatic tachycardia |
| Musculoskeletal/fatigue predominant | Myalgia, arthralgia, post-exertional malaise, chronic fatigue |
| Gastrointestinal/autonomic | Nausea, diarrhea, early satiety, reflux, abdominal pain, temperature dysregulation |
| Multisystem/inflammatory (“systemic”) | Low-grade fever, skin rashes, thyroid dysfunction, glucose instability |
| Based on references 1-4, 7, 8, 10, and 13-15. | |
Temporal Patterns1,2,9,10,14
Longitudinal analyses show that symptom prevalence declines over time but with variable trajectories:
- 0 to 3 months: fatigue, cough, anosmia, and low-grade fever;
- 3 to 12 months: palpitations, sleep disturbance, and neuropathic pain; and
- >12 months: cognitive impairment, dysautonomia, and musculoskeletal pain.
The severity of acute infection, female sex, and the presence of autoantibodies predict a longer duration and multi-cluster involvement.
Pathophysiology and Immune Dysregulation
Viral Persistence and Immune Activation
Autopsy and molecular studies have demonstrated that SARS-CoV-2 RNA and the spike protein can persist for months in the brains, gut microbiota, and endothelial tissues of immunocompetent individuals. These residual antigens act as chronic immune stimulants, maintaining interferon signaling and cytokine production (interleukin [IL]-1beta, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha) and driving ongoing inflammation.3,7,13,16
Accumulating evidence indicates that persistence of SARS-CoV-2 antigens in tissues also triggers complement activation and platelet–fibrin interactions, amplifying coagulation pathways and immunothrombosis. While reinfection can also contribute, current studies highlight viral persistence as a key driver of this complement–clotting feedback loop.5,15,17-19
Complement Overactivation and Microvascular Injury
Abnormal elevation of C3a, C5b-9, and mannose-binding lectin–associated serine protease 2 has been reported months after infection. Cardiovascular imaging confirms microvascular endothelial injury, platelet hyperreactivity, and perivascular inflammation, even in patients with mild acute disease. Resistant fibrinaloid microclots likely perpetuate a complement–coagulation feedback loop and tissue hypoxia.5,15,18,19
Immune Exhaustion and Autoantibody Formation
Peripheral immunophenotyping reveals a decrease in naive T and B cells, expansion of CD8+ T cells and non-classic monocytes, and emergence of autoantibodies targeting interferon and G-protein–coupled receptors. These findings help explain fluctuating symptoms and incomplete viral antigen clearance.3,7,16,20,21
Neuroimmune and Autonomic Dysregulation
Neuroimaging and neurocognitive studies reveal microglial activation, reduced frontocortical metabolism, and elevated chemokine levels, which parallel the changes observed in cancer therapy–related cognitive changes. Autonomic testing identifies persistent tachycardia, orthostatic intolerance, and thermoregulatory disturbance, linking systemic immune activity to central and peripheral autonomic networks.4,5,22
Therapeutic Landscape: Bridging Mechanisms to Targeted Interventions
Rationale for Immune-Restorative Therapy
As mechanistic clarity improves, treatment priorities are shifting from symptomatic control to targeted interventions that restore immune balance and vascular integrity (Table 3). The convergence of chronic inflammation, complement dysregulation, and immune exhaustion provides a rationale for therapies that modulate, rather than suppress, the immune response.3,7
| Table 3. Representative Immune-Targeted Therapies In Long COVID by Primary Mechanism | |
| Therapy class | Primary mechanism/target |
|---|---|
| IVIG | Fc receptor blockade; modulation of T- and B-cell signaling; complement inhibition; neutralization of autoantibodies |
| Complement inhibitors, anti-C5 mAbs | Inhibit C1 or C5 activation ? reduce microvascular injury and complement–clotting feedback loop |
| ECT | Viral clearance + immune reset (antivirals + corticosteroids + IVIG/mAbs) |
| FcRn inhibitors | Accelerate catabolism of pathogenic IgG to reduce autoantibody load |
| Convalescent plasma/hyperimmune Ig | Provides polyclonal neutralizing IgG and opsonizing antibodies for viral clearance |
| ECT, early combined therapy; FcRn, neonatal Fc receptor; Ig, immunoglobulin; IVIG, intravenous immunoglobulin; mAbs, monoclonal antibodies. Based on references 3, 5, 6, 21, and 23-27. | |
Intravenous Immunoglobulin: Immune Recalibration
Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) exerts multifaceted immunoregulatory effects, neutralizing pathogenic autoantibodies, inhibiting complement deposition, and modulating Fc receptor signaling. Clinical data, although limited, show encouraging outcomes in selected populations (Table 4).
| Table 4. Clinical Evidence for IVIG in Long COVID and Related Post-Infectious Syndromes | ||||
| Study and year | Population/design | IVIG dose and duration | Main findings/outcomes | Evidence strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hogeweg M, et al, 2022 (J Intern Med) | 10 patients with post-COVID fatigue and cognitive dysfunction vs matched controls; retrospective case–control study | 0.5 g/kg every month × 3-4 courses | Significant ISARIC-4C score improvement vs controls Most benefit in fatigue, listlessness, brain fog Well tolerated | Observational (case–control study) |
| Thompson J, et al, 2023 (Front Immunol) | 9 long-COVID patients with neurologic, pulmonary, or cardiac symptoms (6 treated, 3 untreated); open-label case series | 0.5 g/kg every 2 wk (=3 mo) | Marked functional and symptomatic improvement in most treated patients Subjective data No controls | Case series |
| GrÖning R, et al, 2024 (Int J Infect Dis) | 16 immunocompromised, vaccine nonresponders with persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection | 20 g daily × 3 d (median, 60 g total) | Clinical cure in 15/16 patients Viral clearance in 13/16 at 4-mo follow-up Safe; 1 case of deep vein thrombosis reported | Retrospective cohort study |
| RECOVER-NEURO (NCT05350774, NIH) | NIH randomized, placebo-controlled trial in patients with neuro-PASC symptoms | 0.4 g/kg × 5 d | Primary end point: change in PROMIS and cognitive scores Estimated completion: 2026 | Interventional |
| ISARIC 4C, UK International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infections Consortium Coronavirus Clinical Characterization Consortium; IVIG, intravenous immunoglobulin; NIH, National Institutes of Health; PASC, post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection; PROMIS, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System. Based on references 6, 23, 26, and 27. | ||||
Mechanistically, IVIG down-regulates activated macrophages and normalizes regulatory T-cell signaling. Collectively, these studies support IVIG as a potential immune-reset therapy for immune dysregulation and hypogammaglobulinemia.3,6,23,26,27
Limitations and Considerations3,6,23,26,27
- No targeted antiviral effect. IVIG does not directly neutralize SARS-CoV-2, and antibody content varies by manufacturing year, leading to inconsistent anti–SARS-CoV-2 titers.
- Evidence remains limited. Most data derive from small, uncontrolled case series; larger randomized studies such as RECOVER-NEURO are ongoing.26
- Access barriers. Payor approval often requires documentation of hypogammaglobulinemia or autoantibodies, restricting use despite reported benefit in neuroimmune dysautonomia.
Early Combined Therapy: Disrupting The Inflammatory Cascade25,27,28
In early or subacute long COVID, combining antivirals, corticosteroids, and immunoglobulin may prevent chronic immune activation. Studies show that use of antivirals plus IVIG in antibody-deficient or immunocompromised patients with persistent SARS-CoV-2 antigenemia leads to viral clearance and symptom resolution. Early combined therapy aims to:
- reduce residual viral load;
- suppress hyperinflammatory cytokine responses; and
- reestablish immune homeostasis.
While larger controlled trials are pending, this strategy illustrates that the early intervention could prevent transition to chronic immune activation.
Complement Inhibitors: Targeting The C3/C5 Axis
Persistent complement activation contributes to vascular injury and organ dysfunction in long COVID.5,15 Therapeutic agents under investigation include the following:
- Recombinant C1 esterase inhibitor. The phase 2 trial (NCT04705831) completed in 2024; the drug reduced fatigue and normalized C5b-9.29,30
- Eculizumab and ravulizumab-cwvz. Anti-C5 monoclonals were used compassionately for long-COVID–associated microangiopathy.31,32
- Small-molecule C3 inhibitors set the preclinical stage for complement–clotting inflammation.33
By directly blocking the complement-mediated vascular injury, these agents may restore perfusion and reduce neurovascular symptoms.
Multispecialty Care Pathways And Validated Assessments
Effective management of long COVID requires a multidisciplinary, data-driven approach anchored in objective functional tracking and measurement of therapeutic response. Validated tools such as the Composite Autonomic Symptom Score-31 scale, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, 6-Minute Walk Test, and PROMIS Fatigue (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) scale are widely used to quantify autonomic, cognitive, and exercise outcomes (Table 5).26,34,35
| Table 5. Interdisciplinary Care Model for Immune-Targeted Therapy in Long COVID | ||
| Team role | Primary responsibilities | Key assessment tools/metrics |
|---|---|---|
| Neurology | Evaluate autonomic and small-fiber neuropathy; assess cognitive and neuroimmune dysfunction | COMPASS-31 (autonomic), Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory for cognitive–fatigue screening, MoCA |
| Immunology | Identify autoantibodies, cytokine signatures, complement activation | Autoantibody panel, cytokine panel (IL-6, TNF-alpha), complement C3/C5b-9 profiling |
| Cardiology | Characterize microvascular injury, dysautonomia, and exercise intolerance | Tilt-table test, orthostatic heart rate assessment |
| Pharmacy | Ensure infusion safety, lot traceability, and protocol adherence for IVIG or complement biologics | Infusion rate monitoring, adverse event documentation, EHR lot tracking |
| Rehabilitation/physical therapy | Guide energy pacing and graded reconditioning; monitor functional recovery | 6MWT, PCFS scale, PROMIS Fatigue, gait and balance assessment |
| 6MWT, 6-Minute Walk Test; COMPASS-31, Composite Autonomic Symptom Score-31; EHR, electronic health record; IL-6, interleukin-6; IVIG, intravenous immunoglobulin; MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment; PCFS, Post-COVID Functional Status; PROMIS, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System; TNF, tumor necrosis factor. Based on references 26, 34, and 35. | ||
Integration relies on shared dashboards, regular multidisciplinary rounds, and standardized patient-reported outcome measures.
Barriers and Ethical Implications for Off-Label Immunotherapy6,7,34,36
Despite emerging clinical evidence, IVIG and complement inhibitors remain off-label for long COVID, creating payor resistance and access inequities. Most insurers require documentation of at least 1 of the following before approving IVIG:
- quantitative IgG deficiency;
- proven autoimmune diagnosis; or
- failed trial of standard symptomatic therapy.
This poses challenges for patients with immune dysautonomia, small-fiber neuropathy, or complement abnormalities, who often lack positive autoimmune markers despite objective dysfunction. The time-sensitive nature of immune modulation in long COVID amplifies the clinical and ethical concern.
From an ethical standpoint, Immunoglobulin National Society Standards of Practice recommend that off-label use of biologics include informed consent, transparent documentation of the rationale, shared decision-making, and longitudinal outcome tracking to ensure therapeutic accountability and patient safety.
Conclusion
Long COVID represents a novel intersection of viral persistence, immune dysregulation, and multi-organ sequelae. Multidisciplinary coordination and scientifically grounded patient selection are essential as the field moves toward a precision immunology framework for extended COVID-19 care. Ongoing clinical trials will help define optimal timing, dosing, and candidate selection for immunomodulatory treatments, bringing long COVID closer to a condition that can be treated with precision.
The authors reported no relevant financial disclosures.
References
- Hou Y, et al. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2025;12(9):ofaf533.
- Geng LN, et al. JAMA. 2025;333(8):694-700.
- Peluso MJ, et al. Cell. 2024;187(20):5500-5529.
- Takao M, et al. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2023;77(2):72-83.
- Bayarri-Olmos R, et al. JCI Insight. 2025;10(16):e194314.
- Hogeweg M, et al. J Intern Med. 2023;293(5):656-658.
- Gupta G, et al. Compr Physiol. 2025;15(3):e70019.
- Xie Y, et al. N Engl J Med. 2024;391(6):515-525.
- Shah DP, et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2025;8(1):e2455430.
- Lammi V, et al. Nat Genet. 2025;57(6):1402-1417.
- Gottlieb M, et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2025;8(8):e2526310.
- RECOVER Initiative. RECOVER study examines how a person’s sex impacts long COVID risk. Published 2025. Accessed December 11, 2025. recovercovid.org/news/recover-study-examines-how-persons-sex-impacts-long-covid-risk
- Stein SR, et al. Nature. 2022;612(7941):758-763.
- Davis HE, et al. EClinicalMedicine. 2021;38:101019.
- Tsampasian V, et al. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2025;32(6):485-498.
- Garmendia JV, et al. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2022;45(1):33-50.
- Lupi L, et al. Pathogens. 2024;13(5):388.
- Cervia-Hasler C, et al. Science. 2024;383(6680):eadg7942.
- Kell DB, et al. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2024;8(7):102566.
- Klein J, et al. Nature. 2023;623(7985):139-148.
- Hurme A, et al. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1146500.
- Morse BA, et al. Brain Behav Immun. 2025;123:725-738.
- Thompson JS, et al. Front Immunol. 2023;13:1033651.
- Senefeld JW, et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(1):e2250647.
- Rotundo S, et al. BMC Infect Dis. 2025;25(1):616.
- Immunotherapy for neurological post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05350774. Accessed December 11, 2025. clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05350774
- GrÖning R, et al. Int J Infect Dis. 2024;144:107046.
- Piano Mortari E, et al. Clin Exp Immunol. 2022;209(3):259-261.
- Melamed I, et al. Front Neurol. 2025;16:1523814.
- Study to evaluate the benefit of RUCONEST in improving neurological symptoms in post-COVID-19 infection. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04705831. Accessed December 11, 2025. clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04705831
- Aurora T, et al. Haematologica. 2022;107(10):2517-2522.
- Shahid K, et al. Cureus. 2023;15(9):e46185.
- Guaschino V, et al. Front Immunol. 2025;16:1620996.
- Immunoglobulin National Society. Immunoglobulin Therapy Standards of Practice. Edition 3.2. Published 2024. Accessed December 11, 2025. ig-ns.org/product/ig-therapy-standards-of-practice-version-3-2
- COVID-19 treatment clinical care for outpatients. CDC. June 11, 2025. Accessed December 11, 2025. cdc.gov/covid/hcp/clinical-care/outpatient-treatment.html
- Insurers block immunoglobulin access using multiple tactics. Immune Deficiency Foundation Policy Brief. May 1, 2024. Accessed December 11, 2025. primaryimmune.org/resources/news-articles/insurers-block-immunoglobulin-access-using-multiple-tactics
Copyright © ___Year___ McMahon Publishing, 545 West 45th Street, New York, NY 10036. Printed in the USA. All rights reserved, including the right of reproduction, in whole or in part, in any form.
Download to read this article in PDF document:
Restoring Immune Homeostasis In Long COVID: Evolving Insights Into Pathophysiology And Therapeutic Strategies






